Close
  Indian J Med Microbiol
 

Figure 4: Effect on body weight of the effective subfractions in Atractylodes macrocephala. Control group (A); model group (B); Water Fraction (1.964 g/kg) group (C); Water Fraction (0.982 g/kg) group (D); Petroleum Ether Fraction (0.01233 g/kg) group (E); Petroleum Ether Fraction (0.006165 g/kg) group (F); Crude Polysaccharide Fraction (2.200 g/kg) group (G); Crude Polysaccharide Fraction (1.100 g/kg) group (H); positive drug group (I); Cumulative values are reported as Mean ± standard deviation for 10 mice in each group, δP < 0.05, δδP < 0.01 compared with control group; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared with model group

Figure 4: Effect on body weight of the effective subfractions in <i>Atractylodes macrocephala</i>. Control group (A); model group (B); Water Fraction (1.964 g/kg) group (C); Water Fraction (0.982 g/kg) group (D); Petroleum Ether Fraction (0.01233 g/kg) group (E); Petroleum Ether Fraction (0.006165 g/kg) group (F); Crude Polysaccharide Fraction (2.200 g/kg) group (G); Crude Polysaccharide Fraction (1.100 g/kg) group (H); positive drug group (I); Cumulative values are reported as Mean ± standard deviation for 10 mice in each group, <sup>δ</sup><i>P</i> < 0.05, <sup>δδ</sup><i>P</i> < 0.01 compared with control group; *<i>P</i> < 0.05, **<i>P</i> < 0.01 compared with model group